Introduction

In today’s digital age, the increase in global networking and the migration of private and business aspects to the electronic domain have elevated cybersecurity threats to alarming levels. Cybersecurity involves the protection of data confidentiality, integrity, availability, and authenticity. Manual rule-based systems have historically attempted to address these threats, but maintaining and updating these systems requires significant effort. To overcome these limitations, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now integrated into cybersecurity tools for attack detection and prevention. Companies like DataRobot, a leader in AI-driven solutions, are leveraging Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to enhance transparency and trust in cybersecurity applications. The lack of transparency in traditional AI models poses a challenge, which is where XAI plays a crucial role by ensuring interpretability and trustworthiness while enhancing the efficiency of these tools.

While ML-driven systems offer precision and efficiency, their adoption faces hurdles due to the opacity of “black-box” models. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) emerges as the solution to this challenge, emphasizing interpretability and transparency without sacrificing performance. XAI systems illuminate how predictions are made, enabling trust in high-risk domains such as cybersecurity. By leveraging XAI, researchers and professionals can address false alarms, biases, and system errors effectively.

This blog presents a comprehensive analysis of XAI’s application in cybersecurity. It focuses on extracting knowledge from the CIC-IDS2017 dataset, evaluating the SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) method, and contrasting its effectiveness with if-then decision tree rules. With detailed methodology, theoretical insights, performance metrics, and practical examples, this blog explores how XAI can revolutionize cybersecurity.

The Role of XAI in Cybersecurity

Challenges in Traditional AI Models

Traditional machine learning systems often lack transparency, making it difficult for users to trust their decision-making processes. In cybersecurity, this lack of interpretability can hinder efforts to identify false alarms or understand the logic behind predictions. The inability to explain results effectively reduces the reliability of these systems in critical situations.

How XAI Solves These Challenges

Explainable AI provides tools to bridge the gap between model performance and interpretability:

• Improved Transparency: Ensures users can comprehend model decisions.
• Enhanced Trust: Builds confidence by enabling users to verify predictions.
• Bias Identification: Detects errors and inconsistencies within the system.

Methodology: A Detailed Analysis

Dataset Selection

The CIC-IDS2017 dataset, created by the Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity, offers data closely resembling real-world network conditions. It contains over 2.8 million instances of benign traffic and multiple modern attack scenarios, making it a robust choice for cybersecurity research.

Data Preparation Steps

1. Data Cleaning:
   • Removal of missing and infinity values.
   • Elimination of features with zero variance.
   • Resulting dataset size: 2,827,876 rows and 70 features.
2. Data Transformation:
   • Combining attack classes to balance representation.
   • Retaining major attack types (DoS, DDoS, brute force, and port scan).
3. Feature Selection:
   • Using the SHAP feature importance method to select the 12 most critical features.

Table: Top Features Selected from CIC-IDS2017 Dataset

Feature Name	Impact
Destination Port	Key indicator for benign traffic and various attacks.
Packet Length Mean	Differentiates attack types based on size variations.
Flow IAT Mean	Helps identify specific attack types like DoS.

XAI Techniques Explored

1. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations)

• Provides both global and local explanations for AI models.
• Measures feature importance across multiple samples and individual predictions.
• Visualizations include feature importance plots and dependence plots.

2. Decision Tree Rules

• Derives logical if-then rules based on feature thresholds.
• Offers granular insight but faces challenges with large, deep trees.

Working: How XAI Operates in Cybersecurity

Step 1: Model Training

AI models are trained using the CIC-IDS2017 dataset to classify benign traffic and specific types of attacks.

Step 2: Understanding Predictions

1. Global Interpretability (SHAP):
   • Visualizes feature importance to identify key indicators for attack detection.
2. Local Interpretability (SHAP):
   • Explains individual classifications, such as whether traffic is benign or malicious.

Step 3: Logical Insights (Decision Trees)

Decision trees produce hierarchical if-then rules, offering detailed pathways for understanding attack patterns.

Results: Evaluating XAI Performance

Key Findings

1. Destination Port:
   • Identified as the most critical feature for classifying network traffic.
   • Shows distinctive patterns for benign and malicious traffic across various attacks.
2. Comparison of SHAP and Decision Tree Rules:
   • SHAP simplifies understanding but may lack granularity for detailed insights.
   • Decision trees provide detailed logic but are challenging to interpret in complex scenarios.

Table: Performance Metrics for XAI Techniques

Model	Accuracy	Explainability	Complexity
SHAP	High	Moderate	Moderate
Decision Trees	Moderate	High	High

Discussion: Insights into XAI Applications

Strengths and Weaknesses

1. Strengths of SHAP:
   • Offers intuitive visualizations.
   • Enables both global and local interpretability.
2. Limitations:
   • Computationally intensive for large datasets.
   • Requires multiple plots for in-depth analysis.

Practical Applications

• Real-time intrusion detection systems.
• Anomaly detection in high-risk environments.

Conclusion: The Impact of XAI on Cybersecurity

Explainable Artificial Intelligence enhances trust and transparency in cybersecurity systems. By using SHAP and decision trees, researchers can unlock insights into model behavior, paving the way for reliable AI solutions. While challenges remain, such as computational complexity, XAI represents a significant leap forward in making AI models interpretable and effective.

Click here to see more.

Reference:

Šarčević, A.; Pintar, D.; Vranić, M.; Krajna, A. Cybersecurity Knowledge Extraction Using XAI. Applied Sciences 2022, 12, 8669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178669.

License:

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.