
Climate change is no longer a distant threat—it is a reality that affects ecosystems, economies, and livelihoods across the world. Rising global temperatures, extreme weather events, and environmental degradation are direct consequences of increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2), which remains the most significant driver of climate change. The largest contributors to CO2 emissions are countries with high industrial activity, fossil fuel consumption, and energy-intensive economies.
Sustainability has emerged as the cornerstone of climate action. Governments, businesses, and individuals are adopting strategies to transition toward greener energy sources, improve financial mechanisms supporting climate initiatives, and regulate industrial practices to reduce emissions. This paper examines six key sustainability-driven factors influencing CO2 emissions—Green Energy Transition (GET), Fossil Fuel Consumption (FFC), Financial Development (FD), Mineral Resource Consumption (MRC), Energy Intensity (EI), and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Using advanced econometric modeling, the study provides empirical evidence on how these variables contribute to or mitigate climate change in the world’s highest carbon-emitting nations.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial in formulating effective policies that balance economic growth with environmental responsibility. A shift toward clean energy, responsible resource usage, and innovative financial instruments can pave the way for a more sustainable future.
1. Green Energy Transition (GET) and Sustainable Energy Policies
Green Energy Transition (GET) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways to combat climate change. It involves shifting from fossil fuel-based energy production to renewable sources such as solar, wind, hydro, and biomass. By reducing dependency on coal, oil, and natural gas, countries can significantly lower their carbon footprints while ensuring long-term sustainability in energy production.
How GET Supports Long-Term Sustainability
The transition to green energy plays a vital role in reducing global carbon emissions while promoting economic sustainability. Unlike fossil fuels, renewable energy sources have lower operational costs and minimal environmental impact. They do not deplete finite natural resources and provide a continuous supply without causing direct harm to ecosystems. Moreover, investing in renewables aligns with climate goals set by international agreements such as the Paris Agreement and the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
A well-executed GET strategy ensures energy security, reduces air pollution, and fosters technological advancements that drive innovation in energy storage and grid management. Countries that prioritize renewable energy can also benefit from job creation in sectors such as solar panel manufacturing, wind turbine installation, and smart grid technology development.
Climate Change: Empirical Findings on GET’s Effectiveness
The paper provides empirical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of GET in reducing CO2 emissions. According to the analysis, a 1% increase in GET results in a 1.59% decrease in CO2 emissions, showcasing its direct impact on environmental sustainability. This strong inverse relationship suggests that countries investing in renewable energy experience measurable improvements in their carbon reduction efforts.
Furthermore, the study highlights how financial investments in clean energy play a critical role in accelerating the transition. Financial markets and governments that support renewable energy projects through subsidies, tax incentives, and research grants see more substantial progress in emission reductions. The research reinforces previous findings that nations with well-integrated renewable energy strategies have lower per capita emissions compared to fossil fuel-dependent economies.
Case Studies of Successful Green Energy Implementation
Several countries have demonstrated the effectiveness of GET through proactive policies and investments:
- Germany – The country’s Energiewende (energy transition) policy aims to phase out coal and nuclear power while expanding renewable energy sources. Wind and solar energy now contribute significantly to Germany’s electricity grid, reducing its reliance on fossil fuels.
- Denmark – Denmark has one of the highest percentages of wind energy in its national grid. Through progressive government policies and investments, the country has become a global leader in offshore wind farm development.
- China – While being one of the largest carbon emitters, China has also emerged as a leader in renewable energy adoption. Massive investments in solar and wind power infrastructure have helped reduce coal dependence and stabilize emissions growth.
- India – With ambitious targets in solar energy capacity, India has rapidly scaled up its renewable energy efforts. Programs like the International Solar Alliance and domestic solar incentives have significantly expanded clean energy usage.
These case studies demonstrate how strong policy frameworks, financial incentives, and technological advancements contribute to successful GET implementation. While challenges remain, including intermittency of renewables and infrastructure costs, the overall impact on sustainability is undeniable.
Climate Change: Policy Recommendations for Strengthening GET
To further enhance the green energy transition, policymakers can adopt the following strategies:
- Subsidies for Renewable Energy Projects – Financial support for solar, wind, and hydro projects can make them more competitive compared to fossil fuels.
- Phasing Out Fossil Fuel Subsidies – Redirecting funds from fossil fuel subsidies toward renewables can accelerate adoption.
- Investment in Energy Storage Technologies – Improving battery storage capabilities can address intermittency issues with wind and solar power.
- Strengthening Grid Infrastructure – Upgrading energy grids to accommodate renewable integration ensures efficiency and reliability.
- Public Awareness and Education Campaigns – Promoting the benefits of renewable energy can encourage widespread adoption among industries and households.
By implementing these policies, countries can drive meaningful progress toward sustainability while reducing their contributions to climate change. GET remains a foundational pillar in global emission reduction strategies, reinforcing the urgent need for continued investments and innovation in the renewable energy sector.
2. Fossil Fuel Consumption (FFC): Challenges in Sustainable Energy Shifts
Fossil fuel consumption is the single largest contributor to climate change, accounting for over 75% of total global greenhouse gas emissions. Coal, oil, and natural gas remain the dominant sources of energy worldwide, powering industries, transportation, and households. However, burning fossil fuels releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere, accelerating global warming and intensifying climate-related disasters such as heatwaves, droughts, and rising sea levels.
The Direct Correlation Between Fossil Fuel Dependence and Climate Change
The relationship between fossil fuel use and climate change is well-established. The combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas generates CO2, which accumulates in the atmosphere and traps heat—leading to rising temperatures. According to the study, a 1% increase in fossil fuel consumption leads to a 1.65% increase in CO2 emissions, reinforcing its significant role in environmental degradation.
Table 1 illustrates the fossil fuel consumption rates of high-emitting countries and their corresponding CO2 emissions.
Table 1: Fossil Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Selected Countries (2000-2021)
Country | Fossil Fuel Share (%) | CO2 Emissions (Metric Tons per Capita) |
---|---|---|
China | 85% | 7.5 |
United States | 79% | 14.2 |
India | 74% | 2.0 |
Russia | 81% | 10.4 |
Germany | 60% | 8.9 |
Japan | 67% | 9.5 |
Saudi Arabia | 88% | 16.1 |
These figures demonstrate that countries heavily reliant on fossil fuels tend to have higher per capita emissions, exacerbating climate change.
Climate Change: Economic and Policy Barriers to Phasing Out Fossil Fuels
Despite growing awareness of climate risks, fossil fuels remain deeply embedded in global economies. Several key barriers hinder efforts to reduce fossil fuel dependency:
- Energy Infrastructure Lock-In Existing power plants, pipelines, and refineries represent billions of dollars in investment. Retiring these assets prematurely or transitioning to renewables requires significant financial resources.
- Economic Dependence on Fossil Fuels Countries with large fossil fuel reserves—such as Russia, Saudi Arabia, and the United States—rely on oil and gas exports for economic growth. Phasing out these industries could lead to job losses and revenue declines, making governments hesitant to act.
- Subsidies Favoring Fossil Fuels Many governments still provide subsidies that make fossil fuels artificially cheap, discouraging investments in renewables. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that global fossil fuel subsidies exceeded $500 billion in 2022, making clean energy alternatives less competitive.
- Technological and Storage Challenges While solar and wind energy provide clean alternatives, issues like energy storage and intermittency continue to pose technical challenges. Advances in battery technology and grid modernization are necessary to ensure a stable transition.
Strategies for Governments to Ensure a Just and Sustainable Energy Transition
A well-managed transition from fossil fuels to clean energy is crucial for sustainability. Governments can adopt several strategies to accelerate this shift:
- Gradual Phase-Out Policies Countries should implement carbon pricing mechanisms such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems to reduce fossil fuel consumption while incentivizing renewables.
- Investment in Renewable Energy Increasing public and private funding for wind, solar, and hydro projects can accelerate the energy transition. Germany’s Energiewende policy is a strong example of long-term renewable energy investment.
- Retraining and Job Creation for Fossil Fuel Workers Transitioning energy sectors should include job retraining programs to shift workers from fossil fuel industries into renewable energy roles. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (2022) introduced provisions for green job creation and retraining initiatives.
- Elimination of Fossil Fuel Subsidies Redirecting subsidies from fossil fuels toward renewables can level the economic playing field. The IMF suggests that removing fossil fuel subsidies could lower global emissions by 28%.
By implementing these strategies, governments can pave the way for a sustainable energy future while mitigating the social and economic impacts of the transition.
Financial Development (FD) as a Catalyst for Green Investment
Financial development plays a critical role in driving sustainable investments. By mobilizing resources toward clean energy infrastructure and environmentally responsible projects, financial markets can accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy. However, the impact of financial development on climate change is not always straightforward—while it can support green investments, it can also fuel energy-intensive industries that contribute to emissions.
Climate Change: The Role of Financial Markets in Advancing Sustainability and Climate Finance
Financial markets influence climate outcomes in several ways:
- Green Bonds and Sustainable Investments Green bonds allow governments and corporations to raise capital for eco-friendly projects, from solar farms to energy-efficient buildings. The global green bond market surpassed $1.1 trillion in 2023, reflecting the growing trend in sustainable finance.
- Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading Financial instruments such as carbon credits and emissions trading help industries lower their carbon footprints while incentivizing emission reductions. The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is one of the most successful examples of market-based climate regulation.
- Public-Private Partnerships for Renewable Energy Collaboration between governments and private investors accelerates the rollout of clean energy projects. The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has funded multiple large-scale solar and wind projects across emerging economies.
Climate Change: How FD Supports Clean Energy Transition and Sustainable Infrastructure
The study found that a 1% increase in financial development leads to a 4.51% decrease in CO2 emissions, suggesting that financial growth can enable green technology deployment when properly directed. Table 2 below highlights financial development levels and their impact on emissions across selected countries.
Table 2: Financial Development Index and CO2 Emissions
Country | Financial Development Index | CO2 Emissions (Metric Tons per Capita) |
---|---|---|
United States | 0.78 | 14.2 |
Germany | 0.71 | 8.9 |
Japan | 0.69 | 9.5 |
China | 0.62 | 7.5 |
India | 0.50 | 2.0 |
Indonesia | 0.48 | 2.3 |
South Africa | 0.55 | 8.1 |
Countries with higher financial development tend to have stronger climate policies and investment frameworks that support sustainable energy solutions.
Climate Change: Policy Recommendations for Integrating Green Finance into Economic Systems
To maximize financial development’s role in sustainability, governments and financial institutions should:
- Expand Green Finance Programs – Promote low-interest loans for renewable energy projects.
- Strengthen Corporate Sustainability Regulations – Require companies to disclose carbon footprints and align investments with climate goals.
- Encourage Institutional Investment in Sustainability – Pension funds and sovereign wealth funds should allocate more capital to green projects.
- Develop Regional Climate Finance Mechanisms – Emerging economies require dedicated financing for clean energy deployment.
A well-structured financial system focused on sustainability can drive significant climate improvements, ensuring that economic growth aligns with global environmental goals.
3. Mineral Resource Consumption (MRC) and Sustainable Resource Management
Environmental Costs of Resource Extraction and Its Impact on Emissions
Mineral resource consumption plays a significant role in global carbon emissions, yet it is often overlooked in climate discussions. The extraction, refining, and processing of minerals require vast amounts of energy, much of which is derived from fossil fuels. Activities such as mining, metal smelting, and refining contribute to both direct and indirect carbon emissions.
According to the study, mineral resource consumption has a positive correlation with CO2 emissions, although the impact is smaller compared to fossil fuel usage. Specifically, a 1% increase in mineral resource consumption leads to a 0.09% increase in CO2 emissions. While this effect may seem minor, it becomes significant when scaled globally across industries such as construction, electronics, and energy infrastructure.
The environmental consequences of mining extend beyond carbon emissions. Mining operations often lead to deforestation, water contamination, and habitat destruction. In countries where mineral extraction is a key industry—such as China, Russia, and South Africa—the ecological toll is severe. Heavy metals and chemical runoff pollute rivers and groundwater, while excessive land degradation disrupts biodiversity.
Additionally, mineral processing requires substantial energy input. For example:
- Aluminum production is highly energy-intensive, with nearly 14 kWh of electricity needed to refine one kilogram.
- Steel manufacturing contributes to nearly 8% of global CO2 emissions, largely due to coal-based blast furnaces.
- Lithium extraction, essential for battery production, consumes vast amounts of water and chemicals, posing sustainability concerns.
These environmental costs demand urgent reforms in mineral extraction and processing practices to align resource consumption with sustainable development goals.
The Importance of Sustainable Mining and Circular Economy Strategies
Sustainable resource management is key to mitigating the negative impacts of mineral extraction. A circular economy approach—which focuses on minimizing waste, improving recycling, and maximizing material efficiency—can significantly reduce emissions associated with mineral use.
Key strategies for sustainable mining include:
- Reducing Dependence on Virgin Materials – Increasing the use of recycled metals (such as aluminum and steel) reduces the demand for newly mined resources, thereby lowering emissions.
- Eco-Friendly Mining Techniques – Adopting low-impact extraction methods, such as precision mining and using renewable energy in mining operations, helps minimize environmental damage.
- Rehabilitating Mining Sites – Restoring land after mining activities through reforestation and soil remediation ensures ecosystems recover over time.
- Improving Efficiency in Mineral Processing – Modernizing production methods to use less energy and fewer chemicals lowers the environmental footprint.
Circular economy models are particularly effective in sectors like construction and electronics manufacturing, where materials such as steel, copper, and rare earth elements are critical. Countries that implement circular economy principles see a 30-40% reduction in mineral-related emissions due to enhanced recycling and reuse practices.
Climate Change: Innovations in Green Mineral Processing for Long-Term Sustainability
Innovations in green mineral processing can play a transformative role in reducing emissions while maintaining industrial output. Emerging technologies aimed at making mining and refining more sustainable include:
- Hydrogen-Based Steel Production – Companies in Europe and Japan are piloting green hydrogen steelmaking, which replaces coal-based furnaces with hydrogen, cutting emissions by nearly 95%.
- Biotechnological Mineral Processing – Certain microorganisms can break down ores, allowing for metal extraction without harmful chemicals or excessive heat.
- Automated Energy-Efficient Mining Operations – AI-powered resource extraction can optimize fuel and electricity use, reducing waste and improving efficiency.
- Sustainable Lithium Extraction Techniques – New water-saving lithium recovery methods use geothermal energy to minimize environmental disruption.
As governments and industries shift toward sustainable mining, scaling these innovations globally will be essential to balancing resource consumption with climate action.
4. Energy Intensity (EI): Efficiency and Sustainable Development Goals
The Link Between EI, Emissions Reduction, and Resource Efficiency
Energy intensity refers to the amount of energy consumed per unit of economic output. A lower energy intensity indicates greater efficiency, meaning less energy is wasted in production processes, transportation, and household consumption.
The study finds that a 1% increase in energy efficiency leads to a 2.39% reduction in CO2 emissions. This highlights the vital role of improved efficiency in mitigating climate change. Countries with low energy intensity—such as Japan and Germany—tend to have advanced energy-saving policies and technologies in place.
Reducing energy intensity is crucial because:
- It lowers energy demand, easing pressure on fossil fuel power generation.
- It reduces costs for businesses and households.
- It supports the clean energy transition by maximizing renewable energy usage.
Energy intensity improvements can be particularly impactful in high-emitting nations. In countries like China and India, where industrial growth drives significant energy demand, efficiency measures can curb emissions while maintaining economic expansion.
Table 1: Energy Intensity Across Selected Countries (MJ per USD of GDP)
Country | Energy Intensity (MJ/USD of GDP) | CO2 Emissions (Metric Tons per Capita) |
---|---|---|
China | 5.8 | 7.5 |
India | 4.9 | 2.0 |
Russia | 5.5 | 10.4 |
United States | 4.0 | 14.2 |
Germany | 2.9 | 8.9 |
Japan | 3.0 | 9.5 |
South Africa | 5.2 | 8.1 |
Countries with lower energy intensity tend to have lower emissions per capita, reinforcing the importance of investing in efficiency measures.
How Technological Advancements Contribute to Lower Energy Intensity
Technology plays a pivotal role in reducing energy intensity across industries. Some innovations improving efficiency include:
- Smart Grid Systems – Advanced electricity distribution grids optimize energy consumption, reducing waste.
- AI-Driven Industrial Automation – AI helps factories minimize unnecessary energy use by optimizing processes.
- Efficient Building Design – Improved insulation, LED lighting, and smart thermostats dramatically cut household energy demand.
- Electric Vehicles (EVs) – Switching to EVs from gasoline-powered cars reduces fossil fuel reliance while promoting cleaner transport options.
- Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) – Emerging CCS technologies capture emissions from industrial processes, preventing CO2 from entering the atmosphere.
Policies Promoting Industrial and Household Energy Efficiency for Climate Sustainability
Governments can implement several key policies to enhance energy efficiency:
- Enforcing Energy Standards – Mandating efficiency standards for appliances, vehicles, and industrial equipment ensures lower energy consumption.
- Encouraging Renewable Energy Adoption – Incentivizing solar, wind, and hydro investments lowers dependency on fossil fuels.
- Retrofitting Aging Infrastructure – Upgrading power grids, roads, and buildings can reduce wasted energy.
- Promoting Behavioral Change – Public awareness campaigns on conservation practices encourage energy-saving habits.
- Subsidizing Energy-Saving Technologies – Providing financial support for businesses and homeowners investing in efficiency improvements accelerates adoption.
By prioritizing energy efficiency, policymakers can drive significant climate benefits while ensuring economic sustainability.
6. Information and Communication Technology (ICT): Sustainable Digital Solutions
The Dual Impact of ICT Expansion—Its Environmental Footprint and Efficiency Potential
The rapid expansion of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has transformed modern economies, revolutionizing industries and enhancing global connectivity. However, despite its undeniable benefits, ICT plays a complex role in climate change. On one hand, digital advancements contribute to higher efficiency, allowing businesses and households to optimize energy consumption. On the other hand, the growth of data centers, cloud computing, and electronic devices significantly increases electricity demand, much of which is still powered by fossil fuels.
The study reveals that a 1% increase in ICT penetration leads to a 0.07% increase in CO2 emissions, indicating that while ICT expansion is relatively less harmful compared to fossil fuels or industrial processes, it does contribute to global carbon emissions. The energy consumption of digital infrastructure—such as data centers, high-speed networks, and electronic manufacturing—has become a major concern for sustainability efforts.
Key contributors to ICT-related emissions include:
- Data Centers – Large-scale cloud computing and AI applications require extensive processing power, leading to high electricity consumption.
- Electronic Devices – The production, use, and disposal of smartphones, laptops, and other digital equipment contribute to resource depletion and emissions.
- Internet Infrastructure – The global network of servers, fiber-optic cables, and satellites demands continuous energy, primarily sourced from fossil fuels.
Despite these challenges, ICT has the potential to be a key enabler of sustainability, helping industries optimize energy use and transition toward greener practices.
How Smart Grids and AI-Driven Technologies Enhance Sustainability
One of the most promising applications of ICT in climate mitigation is the development of smart grids—intelligent electricity distribution systems that optimize energy flow based on demand and supply. These grids leverage real-time monitoring, AI algorithms, and automation to ensure efficient energy use.
How smart grids reduce emissions:
- Demand Response Systems – AI-powered automation adjusts electricity distribution based on usage patterns, reducing waste and lowering peak energy consumption.
- Renewable Energy Integration – Smart grids facilitate the integration of solar and wind power into national energy systems, ensuring a smooth transition away from fossil fuels.
- Grid Stability & Storage Management – AI helps balance electricity loads, preventing inefficiencies and minimizing reliance on backup fossil fuel generators.
Beyond smart grids, AI-driven technologies are emerging as powerful tools for sustainability. Innovations such as predictive analytics for energy optimization, automated climate monitoring, and machine learning-driven efficiency improvements are helping industries reduce emissions.
AI applications in climate sustainability:
- Smart manufacturing – AI minimizes energy waste by optimizing production processes.
- Green logistics – AI-powered routing reduces fuel consumption in transportation.
- Automated building management – Intelligent climate control systems enhance energy efficiency in residential and commercial structures.
These advancements demonstrate that ICT, if used strategically, can reduce carbon emissions instead of increasing them.
Green ICT Policies for Reducing Digital Infrastructure Emissions
To balance the positive and negative impacts of ICT, governments and industries must prioritize green ICT policies. These policies encourage digital sustainability by addressing the environmental footprint of technology while maximizing its potential for efficiency.
Effective green ICT strategies include:
- Carbon-Neutral Data Centers – Transitioning cloud computing facilities to renewable energy sources can significantly lower digital emissions. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft are already investing in green data infrastructure.
- Electronic Waste Management – Governments must implement strong e-waste recycling programs to reduce environmental hazards from discarded digital devices.
- Energy-Efficient Hardware – Manufacturing regulations should enforce low-energy chipsets and processors to improve device efficiency.
- Sustainable AI Development – AI models must be optimized for minimal resource consumption while maintaining computational effectiveness.
A holistic policy framework that considers these elements will ensure ICT growth aligns with climate goals.
Conclusion & Sustainability Policy Recommendations
Summary of Key Sustainability-Driven Findings in Climate Change Mitigation
This study identified six primary sustainability factors influencing carbon emissions—Green Energy Transition (GET), Fossil Fuel Consumption (FFC), Financial Development (FD), Mineral Resource Consumption (MRC), Energy Intensity (EI), and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). While some of these factors reduce emissions, others contribute to climate change, reinforcing the urgent need for strategic policy interventions.
Key findings from the research:
- A 1% increase in Green Energy Transition (GET) lowers CO2 emissions by 1.59%, proving the effectiveness of renewable energy investments.
- Fossil Fuel Consumption (FFC) remains the strongest contributor to emissions, with a 1% increase leading to a 1.65% rise in CO2 levels.
- Financial Development (FD) plays a crucial role, as a 1% increase results in a 4.51% reduction in emissions, highlighting its impact on green investment.
- Mineral Resource Consumption (MRC) has a smaller but notable effect, increasing emissions by 0.09% per additional usage.
- Energy Intensity (EI) improvements significantly lower emissions, with a 1% efficiency gain resulting in a 2.39% reduction.
- ICT expansion has a mixed impact, increasing emissions slightly (0.07%) but offering solutions to enhance efficiency.
Actionable Recommendations for Industries, Policymakers, and Individuals
Based on these findings, the following sustainability-focused recommendations can guide climate mitigation efforts:
Governments & Policymakers:
- Accelerate Renewable Energy Development – Prioritize wind, solar, and hydro investments to lower reliance on fossil fuels.
- Implement Carbon Pricing Mechanisms – Introduce carbon taxes or cap-and-trade programs to discourage emissions-heavy industries.
- Strengthen Green Finance Regulations – Provide incentives for financial markets to support low-carbon projects.
- Promote Circular Economy Models – Encourage recycling, resource efficiency, and sustainable industrial practices.
Industries & Corporations:
- Invest in Energy Efficiency Technologies – Upgrade manufacturing and logistics systems to minimize waste.
- Adopt AI-Driven Sustainability Models – Leverage automation to optimize energy use.
- Commit to Carbon-Neutral Operations – Transition company infrastructure to renewable energy sources.
- Reduce Electronic Waste – Develop recycling programs for outdated digital equipment.
For Individuals:
- Support Sustainable Consumption – Choose energy-efficient appliances and eco-friendly digital devices.
- Reduce Carbon Footprint – Minimize fossil fuel dependence through public transport and clean energy choices.
- Advocate for Climate Policies – Engage in policy discussions and support environmental regulations.
- Practice Digital Sustainability – Limit excessive cloud storage use and recycle old electronics responsibly.
The Need for Global Collaboration in Balancing Economic Growth with Environmental Sustainability
Climate change mitigation is a shared responsibility that requires coordinated global action. Governments, businesses, and individuals must work together to implement sustainable policies while ensuring economic stability. International agreements such as the Paris Climate Accord and the UN Sustainable Development Goals offer frameworks for achieving this balance.
Encouraging technological innovation, green finance, and regulatory enforcement will pave the way for a sustainable future, where economic progress aligns with environmental responsibility.
Reference: Seraj, M., & Seraj, F.T. (2025). The Impact of Sustainable Financial Development and Green Energy Transition on Climate Change in the World’s Highest Carbon-Emitting Countries. Sustainability, 17(3781). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093781
License: This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License. You may freely share and adapt the content, provided proper attribution is given.