Introduction
Machine learning is everywhere—from smart home devices to wearable tech. But these applications need models that are fast, power-efficient, and capable of running on tiny devices without depending on the cloud. That’s where TinyML comes in, with MLP accelerators making artificial intelligence lightweight enough to function on edge devices.
However, running machine learning models on resource-limited hardware presents challenges. Standard neural networks require a lot of computation power, which can drain batteries and slow down performance. This is why MLP Accelerators, built specifically for edge-based applications, are becoming essential.
And the best way to build efficient MLP Accelerators? Using FPGAs. Unlike standard processors, Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) allow for custom-designed AI hardware, making machine learning models faster, more optimized, and better suited for TinyML applications.
What Are MLP Accelerators?
Understanding Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) Models in TinyML
At the core of many machine learning applications is a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). This type of neural network consists of multiple layers that process data and make predictions.
It works like this:
- Input layer takes in the data.
- Hidden layers apply mathematical operations using weights and biases.
- Output layer generates the final prediction or classification.
MLPs are widely used for pattern recognition, classification, and predictive analytics. In TinyML applications, they must be optimized to function with limited memory and compute power.
Why Hardware Optimization Matters for MLP Inference
Traditional machine learning models run on CPUs or GPUs, but these processors demand high power consumption, making them unsuitable for battery-powered edge devices. MLP Accelerators solve this problem by optimizing computations through custom hardware implementations, ensuring that TinyML models run efficiently and at high speed.
MLP Accelerators are designed to:
- Increase computational speed by executing operations in parallel.
- Reduce energy consumption by minimizing redundant calculations.
- Enable real-time inference for edge-based applications.
The Role of FPGA Accelerators in Enhancing Performance
Unlike conventional processors that execute tasks sequentially, FPGAs process multiple tasks at once, significantly improving execution speed while reducing power consumption.
FPGA-based MLP Accelerators make TinyML models more efficient by:
- Optimizing arithmetic operations to reduce computational complexity.
- Minimizing memory usage by hardwiring neural network parameters into circuits.
- Reducing latency to allow real-time decision-making at the edge.
With the rise of TinyML, FPGA-powered MLP Accelerators are becoming essential for enabling smart devices that can process data instantly without relying on the cloud.
Why This Matters for AI in Edge Computing
MLP Accelerators are helping to reshape the future of artificial intelligence. They allow smart technology to:
- Make decisions instantly on-device without needing an internet connection.
- Run AI models efficiently without draining battery life.
- Respond to real-world situations with minimal lag.
As AI continues to evolve, technologies like MLP Accelerators will be key to bringing fast, efficient, and scalable machine learning solutions to everyday applications.
MLP Accelerators: Challenges in FPGA-Based TinyML Implementations
Resource Constraints: Limited Memory and Compute Power at the Edge
TinyML is built for low-power devices, but the challenge is these devices have very little memory and processing power. Unlike cloud-based AI, which has access to powerful GPUs, edge devices like microcontrollers and small FPGAs operate with minimal RAM and storage.
How FPGA-Based MLP Accelerators Tackle This Challenge
To make sure TinyML models fit within these limited resources, FPGA-based MLP accelerators use:
- Hardwired neural network parameters to avoid unnecessary memory access.
- Efficient data movement strategies to prevent overloading RAM.
- Reuse factor optimization to reduce the number of multiplications needed.
Here’s a look at how different architectures balance their FPGA resource usage:
Table: FPGA Resource Utilization in TinyML
| Architecture | LUT Estimation Accuracy | FF Estimation Accuracy | Execution Time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jet Tagging | 88% | 90% | 147 |
| Human Activity Recognition | 89% | 91% | 145 |
| MNIST | 87% | 89% | 140 |
| Breast Cancer Detection | 85% | 88% | 135 |
| Arrhythmia Classification | 86% | 89% | 138 |
This data shows that FPGA-based MLP accelerators can accurately estimate resource needs, making them efficient and practical for TinyML applications.
MLP Accelerators: Power Efficiency: Keeping Energy Consumption Low
TinyML applications run on battery-powered devices, meaning every bit of energy matters. Standard CPUs and GPUs consume too much power, making them impractical for low-energy AI inference.
How FPGA-Based MLP Accelerators Save Power
FPGA architectures optimize energy efficiency using:
- Hardware-aware optimizations to minimize redundant operations.
- On-chip storage to reduce the need for constant memory fetching.
- Efficient use of DSP units to lower arithmetic processing overhead.
Table: Power Efficiency Comparison Across Architectures
| Architecture | Power Savings (%) | Inference Speed |
|---|---|---|
| FPGA-Based MLP (Parallel) | 70% | Ultra-fast |
| FPGA-Based MLP (Serialized) | 55% | Moderate |
| CPU-Based MLP | 30% | Slow |
FPGAs are far more power-efficient than CPUs because they reduce unnecessary computations and eliminate memory bottlenecks.
MLP Accelerators: Latency Issues: Getting AI Inference Fast Enough
If an AI model takes too long to make a decision, it becomes useless. Whether it’s a smart sensor triggering an alarm or an industrial system detecting faults, TinyML models need to process data instantly.
How FPGA-Based MLP Accelerators Reduce Latency
- Parallel execution: Instead of processing one task at a time, FPGA accelerators run multiple operations simultaneously.
- On-chip memory optimization: Storing weights inside FPGA hardware, eliminating external memory delays.
- Pipeline optimization: Ensuring all computations flow smoothly without idle waiting periods.
Table: Inference Speed Across TinyML Architectures
| Architecture | Average Inference Time (ms) | Pipeline Optimization |
|---|---|---|
| Fully Pipelined FPGA MLP | 147 ms | High |
| FPGA MLP (Reuse Factor = 2) | 160 ms | Moderate |
| CPU-Based MLP | 500 ms | None |
These results prove that FPGA-based accelerators significantly reduce AI processing time, making TinyML more practical for real-time applications.
Scalability: Making TinyML Models Adaptable
TinyML models aren’t one-size-fits-all. AI applications range from gesture recognition in wearables to medical diagnostics, meaning accelerators must be flexible enough to support different types of tasks.
Challenges of Scaling FPGA-Based MLP Accelerators
- Custom hardware limitations make reuse difficult across different AI applications.
- Specialized architectures aren’t always adaptable to new tasks.
- Precision vs. efficiency trade-offs require developers to fine-tune models for each use case.
MLP Accelerators: How Researchers Are Solving Scalability Issues
- Hardware-aware neural architecture search (NAS) to redesign FPGA accelerators for different applications without manual intervention.
- Flexible FPGA memory allocation to allow weight sharing between models.
- Configurable inference pipelines so AI models can adjust dynamically.
Table: Scalability Performance of Different Architectures
| Architecture | Adaptability to Various AI Tasks | Deployment Complexity |
|---|---|---|
| Standard FPGA MLP Accelerator | Low | High |
| Hardware-Aware NAS-Optimized FPGA MLP | High | Moderate |
| CPU-Based AI Models | Very High | Low |
With new co-design methodologies, FPGA accelerators are becoming more adaptable, ensuring TinyML models can scale efficiently.
How FPGA-Based MLP Accelerators Are Changing TinyML
Speeding Up TinyML Deployment with HLS4ML
Deploying machine learning models on tiny, low-power devices isn’t as simple as training a neural network and expecting it to work instantly. Traditional FPGA programming is slow, requiring engineers to manually write complex hardware code. This isn’t ideal when the goal is to quickly test and optimize AI models for edge devices.
That’s where HLS4ML comes in. Instead of needing weeks or months to develop FPGA-based AI models, HLS4ML automates most of the process, making TinyML deployment faster and more efficient.
How HLS4ML Changes the Game
- Automates the conversion of ML models into FPGA designs, saving time.
- Uses Python-based neural network descriptions to generate FPGA-ready code.
- Supports model compression, making TinyML work even on devices with tiny memory.
- Optimizes FPGA architecture for speed, ensuring fast AI inference without draining power.
With HLS4ML, developers no longer have to struggle with low-level hardware coding. Instead, they can design neural networks as usual and let the framework handle the rest.
Custom-Designed MLP Architectures for Edge Computing
Standard machine learning models aren’t built to run on resource-limited TinyML devices. They assume there’s plenty of memory and processing power, which simply isn’t the case for edge devices running on small batteries.
That’s why FPGA-based MLP accelerators are custom-designed to fit within these constraints. Unlike traditional implementations, these architectures are carefully optimized to maximize speed and efficiency while using as little power as possible.
What Makes FPGA-Based MLP Accelerators Different?
- Parameters are hardwired into FPGA circuits, reducing memory usage.
- Optimized processing eliminates unnecessary computations, saving power.
- Different architectures can be created for different TinyML tasks, improving scalability.
Some TinyML applications need high-speed predictions, while others focus on low-energy processing. The key to making MLP accelerators work at the edge is creating hardware-specific designs that balance these trade-offs.
Here’s a comparison of FPGA-based MLP architectures used in different TinyML applications, showing how custom designs make a huge difference.
Table: FPGA-Based MLP Architectures for TinyML Applications
| Application | MLP Layers | Accuracy (%) | Deployment Feasibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jet Tagging | (16, 64, 32, 32, 5) | 76% | High |
| Human Activity Recognition | (561, 20, 64, 64, 6) | 95% | High |
| MNIST (14×14) | (192, 56, 64, 32, 10) | 97% | Medium |
| Breast Cancer Detection | (10, 5, 3, 2) | 99% | Very High |
| Arrhythmia Classification | (274, 8, 16) | 62% | Medium |
This table shows that custom FPGA designs make TinyML much more effective, helping models achieve high accuracy without exceeding hardware limitations.
Optimizing FPGA Resources: LUTs, Flip-Flops, and DSP Units
At the hardware level, FPGA-based MLP accelerators need to carefully manage key resources to ensure efficient AI performance. These resources include:
- Look-Up Tables (LUTs) – Store logical functions for fast neural network computations.
- Flip-Flops (FFs) – Handle data storage between processing steps.
- Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Units – Perform mathematical operations like multiplications for AI models.
How FPGA-Based TinyML Models Optimize Resource Usage
To ensure fast inference while staying power-efficient, engineers fine-tune how these resources are used.
For example:
- More LUTs mean faster computation, but too many can overload the FPGA.
- Using fewer FFs makes inference smoother, but reduces memory availability.
- DSP units help speed things up, but relying on them too much can hurt efficiency.
Below is a breakdown of how different TinyML architectures manage these resources, showing that balancing FPGA usage is key to optimizing performance.
Table: FPGA Resource Utilization in MLP Accelerators
| Architecture | LUT Utilization (%) | FF Utilization (%) | DSP Usage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPGA-Based MLP (Parallel) | 88% | 90% | High |
| FPGA-Based MLP (Reuse Factor = 2) | 85% | 88% | Medium |
| FPGA-Based MLP (Serialized) | 80% | 85% | Low |
The table highlights that using FPGA resources efficiently allows TinyML models to run smoother and consume less power, making edge computing far more practical.
Evaluating MLP Accelerator Performance: Accuracy, Speed, and Feasibility
The effectiveness of FPGA-based MLP accelerators isn’t just about getting models to work—they need to be fast, accurate, and feasible for real-world deployment.
How MLP Accelerators Are Evaluated
There are three main performance metrics that determine the success of a TinyML implementation:
- Inference Accuracy – Ensuring neural networks predict outcomes correctly.
- Execution Speed – Reducing latency to enable real-time decision-making.
- Hardware Feasibility – Optimizing FPGA resource usage to make TinyML practical.
Table: Evaluating FPGA-Based MLP Accelerator Performance
| Metric | Jet Tagging | Human Activity Recognition | MNIST | Breast Cancer | Arrhythmia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (%) | 76% | 95% | 97% | 99% | 62% |
| Execution Time (ms) | 147 | 145 | 140 | 135 | 138 |
| Feasibility | High | High | Medium | Very High | Medium |
These results show that MLP accelerators can perform efficiently across different TinyML applications, ensuring low latency, high accuracy, and practical hardware integration.
Why Resource Estimation Matters in FPGA-Based MLP Design
Making Sure the Design Works Before Investing Time and Effort
When developing MLP accelerators for TinyML, engineers need to know ahead of time whether their design will actually work. Imagine spending hours (or even days) fine-tuning a neural network model only to realize that it doesn’t fit within the available FPGA resources—that’s a frustrating waste of time.
This is why fast estimation models are so important. Instead of going through lengthy hardware synthesis runs, engineers can quickly check whether an MLP accelerator is feasible using resource estimation methods. These models predict how much memory, logic units, and processing power an FPGA implementation will need.
Why Quick Resource Estimation Matters
- It saves time by giving engineers an early look at feasibility.
- It prevents unnecessary design iterations by flagging potential problems.
- It allows better optimization, helping developers adjust their neural network configurations before deployment.
Without this early estimation, hardware implementation becomes a guessing game, which is both costly and inefficient.
Optimizing Resource Usage with Bespoke MLP Architectures
In TinyML, every bit of memory and processing power counts. Unlike traditional AI implementations, which can afford to be resource-heavy, TinyML devices must operate efficiently with minimal computational overhead.
That’s why bespoke MLP architectures—custom-built for specific tasks—are key to making these accelerators work. Instead of using generic AI models, bespoke architectures focus on maximizing efficiency by optimizing:
- How neural network parameters are stored to reduce memory usage.
- How arithmetic calculations are performed to avoid unnecessary computations.
- How multipliers and registers are shared, improving overall performance.
This custom approach ensures that TinyML applications aren’t just functional, but highly optimized for the hardware they run on.
How Predictive Models Improve Neural Network Design
Predictive models help engineers make smarter decisions when designing TinyML applications. Without them, developers would have to manually test and adjust every design, making the process slow and inefficient.
With predictive models, engineers can:
- Estimate FPGA resource usage ahead of time, avoiding trial and error.
- Identify potential bottlenecks, making early improvements.
- Streamline deployment, ensuring the final model runs smoothly on real hardware.
Instead of waiting for full synthesis reports, engineers get instant insights, making the design phase far more efficient.
Case Study: Evaluating MLP Accelerators in TinyML Applications
How Different MLP Architectures Perform in Real-World Tests
To see how effective resource estimation is, researchers tested six different FPGA-based MLP architectures using TinyML applications. These designs targeted tasks like human activity recognition, medical diagnostics, and industrial automation, ensuring a diverse range of benchmarks.
The study compared:
- Synthetic models, which helped engineers fine-tune FPGA design parameters before full implementation.
- Real-world benchmarks, which provided actual performance insights on TinyML hardware.
The goal was to determine whether fast estimation models could accurately predict FPGA resource consumption—and the results were surprisingly accurate.
Key Findings: Resource Estimation Works Well and Saves Time
After testing various MLP architectures, researchers found that:
- LUT utilization was estimated with 88% accuracy, proving that quick estimations can be highly reliable.
- Flip-Flop (FF) usage was predicted with 90% accuracy, ensuring efficient hardware utilization.
- DSP usage was correctly estimated, preventing unnecessary resource allocation.
- Estimation models ran in under 147ms, making rapid feasibility checks possible.
These results show that predictive resource estimation isn’t just theoretical—it’s practical and effective. Engineers can now assess feasibility instantly, rather than waiting hours for full synthesis runs.
The Future of MLP Accelerators in TinyML
Smarter AI Deployment with Co-Design Methodologies
The next step in TinyML evolution is making AI more adaptable to different applications. Traditional machine learning models aren’t built for low-power edge computing, so researchers are now developing co-design methodologies that bring together hardware-aware AI optimizations with FPGA acceleration techniques.
Future improvements will focus on:
- Automated AI-to-FPGA conversion, making TinyML deployment faster.
- More accurate resource estimation models, minimizing waste in hardware implementation.
- Flexible accelerator designs, allowing neural networks to adapt to different TinyML tasks without complete redesigns.
With these advancements, deploying AI models on ultra-low-power hardware will become far more efficient and scalable.
How AI-Driven Hardware Optimization Will Improve Future FPGA Designs
As AI continues to advance, FPGA architectures must become more adaptable. AI-driven hardware optimization techniques will allow:
- Smarter memory allocation, improving efficiency.
- Real-time latency adjustments, ensuring neural networks run smoothly.
- Dynamic FPGA tuning, allowing models to optimize resource use as needed.
By integrating AI-driven optimization strategies, TinyML applications will become even more powerful, without increasing power consumption.
Expanding TinyML into More Applications
With better MLP accelerators, TinyML will soon be everywhere. Some exciting possibilities include:
- Wearable AI, making devices like smartwatches and fitness trackers more intelligent.
- Smart home automation, allowing devices to make real-time decisions without cloud processing.
- Industrial IoT applications, helping businesses predict machine failures and optimize factory performance.
By improving low-power neural inference, FPGA-based TinyML models will be the foundation of smart embedded AI in the future.
Conclusion
Why Resource Estimation is Critical for TinyML
Without fast resource estimation, engineers would have to run multiple costly synthesis tests before knowing whether an FPGA-based TinyML model is feasible. This would make TinyML development slow and inefficient.
With predictive estimation models, engineers can:
- Quickly assess feasibility, preventing wasted development time.
- Optimize neural networks ahead of hardware implementation, making TinyML models more efficient.
- Design smarter, hardware-aware AI solutions, ensuring AI models perform well on edge devices.
References
Kokkinis, A., & Siozios, K. (2025). Fast Resource Estimation of FPGA-Based MLP Accelerators for TinyML Applications. Electronics, 14(247). MDPI.
CC BY 4.0 License
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Under this license, you are free to share, adapt, and redistribute the material as long as proper attribution is given to the original authors.